1. To maintain a certain level of quality for all reviews, here are guidelines you should follow:

    First of all, name the product in the title, also include the version if there are major changes between different cheat versions.
    An example for a title would be: xInstantHook CSS v3 review
    Note that here the title of the cheat, the version number and the game is included.

    Please base your review on the following points:
    - Design/Usability
    - Features
    - Security
    - Support
    - Price

    Please give a rating for every category (0-10 points) and also write down some general thoughs. In the end, please also give a combined rating (0-10 points) for the cheat.

CS:Go Experienced Hacker and Coder

Discussion in 'Chod's Cheats' started by RandoSilence, May 9, 2017.

  1. RandoSilence

    RandoSilence New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    - Design/Usability(5/10)
    This is an incredibly complex cheat with terrible documentation leaving you to trial and error often times leaving you scratching your head.
    - Features(6/10)
    While there are a plethora of features, Humanise aim, bayesian curve etc. The aimbot its self is really bad. It is based on a 2D aimbot that is really dated. One positive is that it has a visuals scrubber.
    - Security(7/10)
    Once again, this is a copy paste cheat that has been frankenstein'ed together to make a super mismatched cheat.
    - Support(8/10)
    support is quick.
    - Price(8/10)
    for as bad as it is it costs a lot.

    [Honestly]
    Don't use this cheat, it is having an identity issue. Can't compete with legit or HvH.

    Cheats used for comparison:
    Interwebs
    League Mode
    League Cheats
    Iniuria
    Platinum Cheats
    Chod's Cheats
    My own.
     
    #1
  2. dida1990

    dida1990 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2016
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    4
  3. RandoSilence

    RandoSilence New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    was that v.2 or 3
     
    #3